Skip to content
41

neos

Skip it

Soft demand (-62.8% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 13Growth 0Conversion 14Competition 75Returns 99Price range 47Avg price 68Brand share 6Review moat 42Quality gap 77

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Great40%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Good$119.83

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Okay$4.83–$187.41

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,271.03

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Bad1.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad$52K

$52K/yr · 39K searches

Brand share

Bad98%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Growth

Bad-62.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (40% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

8 rising

Sellers

94

Top-5 brand share

98%

Open market

1%

  • NEOS88%
  • TINGLEY3%
  • HEKEDES2%
  • Neosporin2%
  • Johnson & Johnson2%
  • SPATZWEAR1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 1%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$2K8%$4K12%$6K16%$8K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)2 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 33 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -62.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Black Friday '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 8.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall17%

“seem to be well made”

Value For Money10%

“Good value”

Ease Of Use8%

“Easy to use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“As advertised”

Efficiency6%

“It works quickly”

Size-Overall6%

“the exact fitting spot”

Skin Health3%

“the cream helped the skin heal without any irritation”

Charging3%

“charges very fast”

Disinfection2%

“Excellent anabiotic”

Tooth Brightening2%

“Its gives you thst fresh from the denidt feel”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall15%

“Size runs small”

Functionality-Overall10%

“Does not work for me”

Durability8%

“Not the most durable”

Water Resistance6%

“The water does not last long”

Weight Heavy6%

“They are a little bulky”

Allergies4%

“I tend to be allergic to oils”

Ease Of Use3%

“Cumbersome”

Itch Relief3%

“Its hard to find the pain itch”

Hard Feel3%

“not soft like it was in the past”

Quality-Overall2%

“Garbage”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall50%
Feet Fit9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Functionality-Overall5%
Length3%
Weight Heavy3%
Ease Of Use2%
Material Quality2%
Leak-Proof2%
Value For Money2%