Skip to content
50

moth wings

Worth a look

Shows a thin review moat (277 avg reviews), but weak search conversion (0.9%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 19Growth 74Conversion 12Competition 45Returns 21Price range 76Avg price 86Brand share 57Review moat 86Quality gap 79

Review moat

Great277.23

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Great$19.59

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Great$9.23–$34.13

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+58.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Good71%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay58%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Returns

Bad6.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Bad$74K

$74K/yr · 403K searches

Conversion

Bad0.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

The top 5 products take 58% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 falling

Sellers

17

Top-5 brand share

71%

Open market

22%

  • Ryshman30%
  • Seasons13%
  • Remagr11%
  • BWVQNO9%
  • Niurui7%
  • Yinder7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$7K20%$15K30%$22K40%$30K1101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 22 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +58.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
60K40KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Sep, Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 33.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money21%

“Worth the Price”

Quality-Overall11%

“So cute and surprisingly good quality got lots of compliments”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“They were better than expected”

Size-Overall9%

“are the perfect size”

Material Quality9%

“Very cute, the material is clearly polyester”

Durability5%

“They are durable”

Weather Proof4%

“cold-weather-friendly costume”

Ease Of Use3%

“Easy to wear”

Design-Overall3%

“The details are fabulous”

Strength3%

“Sturdy and adorable”

What buyers complain about

Durability16%

“Broke after wearing it my first time”

Advertised Vs Actual Product13%

“Not identical”

Material Quality13%

“Cheap material”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity4%

“The loops stretch taught when I reach in front of me with both arms”

Color4%

“not the oxblood/burgundy/dark red depicted here”

Quality-Overall3%

“this may not be the quality you would want”

Shape/Style3%

“The wings pattern was kinda fuzzy”

Ease Of Use3%

“a little hard to figure out how to wear at first”

Transparency3%

“the wings were sheer”

Size-Overall3%

“It's a little long on me I'm 5,2 its just a little long”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall23%
Material Quality11%
Quality-Overall10%
Length7%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Color6%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Thin4%
Smell3%
Strength2%