Skip to content
48

monturas de lentes para mujer

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.3%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 22Growth 19Conversion 4Competition 93Returns 37Price range 20Avg price 95Brand share 96Review moat 42Quality gap 58

Brand share

Incredible33%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Avg price

Incredible$46.07

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great22%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay2,320.7

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Okay4.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Bad$89K

$89K/yr · 568K searches

Price range

Bad$5.82–$430.54

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Bad-11.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (22% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

57 falling

Sellers

99

Top-5 brand share

33%

Open market

63%

  • Armani Exchange10%
  • Buyisgle8%
  • FEISEDY6%
  • Meta5%
  • SIGONNA5%
  • MUJOSH4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$2K4%$4K6%$5K8%$7K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 89 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -11.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSpike '24Prime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall19%

“Fits as expected”

Quality-Overall15%

“Amazing quality”

Value For Money9%

“Great Value”

Comfort-Overall8%

“Comfortable and Durable”

Shape/Style8%

“Cute and stylish”

Weight Light6%

“These blue light glasses are lightweight”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“As described”

Color3%

“Great color assortment”

Ease Of Use3%

“easy to wear”

Strength3%

“Very sturdy frames”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall23%

“Too short”

Quality-Overall8%

“Poor quality control”

Durability7%

“dont last”

Strength5%

“Super fragile”

Color5%

“They are much darker”

Value For Money5%

“waste of money”

Functionality-Overall4%

“they stop working”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Not as described or as pictured”

Blue Light Filter3%

“Dont block blue light”

Connectivity-Overall3%

“It wouldnt stay connected”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall60%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Functionality-Overall5%
Value For Money3%
Color3%
Shape/Style3%
Quality-Overall2%
Comfort-Overall2%
Lenses2%
Connectivity-Overall1%