Skip to content
41

jordans 11

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.1%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 58Growth 20Conversion 1Competition 96Returns 24Price range 28Avg price 73Brand share 17Review moat 42Quality gap 38

Competition

Incredible15%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Good$105.82

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good$454K

$454K/yr · 7.2M searches

Review moat

Okay2,274.7

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Okay$7.99–$307.57

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Returns

Bad6.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Bad-9.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad93%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Conversion

Bad0.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (15% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

23 rising

Sellers

464

Top-5 brand share

93%

Open market

6%

  • Nike83%
  • Reebok6%
  • Jordan4%
  • PUMA1%
  • K-Swiss1%
  • Endoto1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (17 brands, 6%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%1%$5K2%$9K3%$14K4%$18K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 179 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 84 weeks — -9.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
300K200KSpike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Holiday '25DecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Comfort-Overall25%

“So comfortable”

Size-Overall22%

“Fit is perfect”

Quality-Overall15%

“well made quality shoes”

Value For Money10%

“Good Value”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“It was exactly what I wanted”

Exercise/Sports Suitability3%

“good for working out”

Color3%

“colors of the shoes”

Soft Feel2%

“Soft and comfy”

Shape/Style2%

“Style”

Durability2%

“Sleek comfortable durable”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall29%

“size small”

Product Condition12%

“Was used”

Comfort-Overall9%

“Not comfortable at all”

Feet Fit5%

“Not for wide feet”

Quality-Overall5%

“Seems quality in Nike below $120 are lacking”

Durability3%

“they are already coming apart”

Value For Money3%

“expensive”

Width3%

“Also, Nike does not make a wide sneaker so anything that says wide is not correct”

Leather Quality2%

“the leather stretch is not good dont know why”

Stitch/Finish/Polish2%

“stitching is bad”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall30%
Feet Fit27%
Width15%
Length9%
Color3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Comfort-Overall2%
Shape/Style1%
Material Quality1%
Product Condition1%