Skip to content
33

jordan 1 low

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.1%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 22Growth 20Conversion 1Competition 95Returns 20Price range 45Avg price 73Brand share 4Review moat 46Quality gap 24

Competition

Incredible20%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Good$106.27

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Okay1,897.09

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Okay$7.99–$198.10

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad$86K

$86K/yr · 811K searches

Growth

Bad-10.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Bad7.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Bad99%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Conversion

Bad0.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (20% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

8 rising

Sellers

349

Top-5 brand share

99%

Open market

1%

  • Nike79%
  • Reebok15%
  • Jordan2%
  • Vans1%
  • AIR JORDAN1%
  • Marc Joseph New York1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 1%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$2K4%$3K6%$5K8%$7K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)3 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 122 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -10.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
200K150KSpike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Aug, Sep, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 9.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Comfort-Overall26%

“Very comfortable”

Size-Overall21%

“Fit perfect”

Quality-Overall14%

“Hi quality and constable fit”

Value For Money9%

“Good Value”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“Awesome, as described”

Color6%

“Their like a yellow/white color”

Shape/Style4%

“Air: comfortable + classic styling = win~win”

Durability2%

“they are durable”

Ease Of Use2%

“They are comfortable”

Ease Of Cleaning2%

“My daughter loves them they also dont get dirty easily”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall27%

“it didn't fit”

Product Condition15%

“Came in used. Showed up used....”

Stitch/Finish/Polish11%

“stitching is bad”

Durability9%

“Se rompio a las 3 usadas parece no ser original definitivamente lo devolvere.”

Leather Quality5%

“Fake leather”

Functionality-Overall5%

“Didn't work out”

Comfort-Overall5%

“uncomfortable”

Quality-Overall5%

“Poor quality”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“It doesnt show the size”

Width2%

“Also, Nike does not make a wide sneaker so anything that says wide is not correct”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall31%
Feet Fit27%
Width12%
Length11%
Color3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Comfort-Overall2%
Product Condition2%
Shape/Style2%
Value For Money1%