Skip to content
59

grey shorts

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 17% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 12Growth 95Conversion 9Competition 96Returns 31Price range 71Avg price 84Brand share 96Review moat 23Quality gap 62

Competition

Incredible17%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Incredible35%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Growth

Incredible+125.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great$18.59

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$7.09–$34.01

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Okay5.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Bad6,784.2

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad$48K

$48K/yr · 366K searches

Conversion

Bad0.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (17% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

73 rising

Sellers

115

Top-5 brand share

35%

Open market

61%

  • Amazon Essentials12%
  • AUTOMET7%
  • SOLY HUX6%
  • Hanes5%
  • JMIERR5%
  • NIMENJOJA4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$9664%$2K6%$3K8%$4K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 140 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Comfort-Overall21%

“So comfortable”

Size-Overall20%

“Fit great”

Value For Money10%

“Can't beat this price”

Quality-Overall9%

“Great quality and perfect fir”

Pockets/Compartments5%

“lots of pockets”

Material Quality3%

“Good material”

Soft Feel3%

“The material is soft”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Just as advertised”

Exercise/Sports Suitability2%

“Nice looking shorts for working out”

Color2%

“Colors are bright”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall23%

“Runs a little small”

Quality-Overall8%

“Horrible quality”

Thickness5%

“They are not the overly thick material. like cmfrt brand thick”

Material Quality4%

“Material is also very cheap”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Not as described”

Durability2%

“These fall apart”

Color2%

“Grey is not good for that”

Thin2%

“Extremely thin”

Pockets/Compartments2%

“Pockets arent deep”

Transparency2%

“Completely see through”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall46%
Waist Fit15%
Length9%
Material Quality7%
Inseam Fit4%
Thigh Fit4%
Thin3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%
Hip Fit2%
Color2%