Skip to content
49

green shorts

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.5%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 25Growth 19Conversion 6Competition 96Returns 6Price range 75Avg price 86Brand share 93Review moat 26Quality gap 77

Competition

Incredible15%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Great42%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Avg price

Great$19.40

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Great$8.72–$34.34

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay3,879.44

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay$100K

$100K/yr · 1.1M searches

Growth

Bad-12.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Bad10.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (15% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

66 rising

Sellers

89

Top-5 brand share

42%

Open market

53%

  • PINSPARK10%
  • Amazon Essentials10%
  • CRZ YOGA9%
  • ANRABESS7%
  • BMJL6%
  • G Gradual5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$2K4%$4K6%$6K8%$8K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 141 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -12.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
125K75KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 20.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall20%

“Fits like a glove”

Comfort-Overall18%

“Most comfortable”

Color10%

“Beautiful green”

Quality-Overall5%

“Excellent quality”

Pockets/Compartments4%

“DEEP pockets”

Soft Feel4%

“Buttery soft”

Material Quality3%

“Otherwise, material is soft and comfortable”

Exercise/Sports Suitability3%

“Amazing shorts for workouts and runs”

Value For Money2%

“A good value at this price point as well”

Weight Light2%

“These shirts are light”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall26%

“Buy a Size larger”

Color5%

“not at all green”

Quality-Overall5%

“not well made”

Material Quality5%

“Cheap material, uncomfortable”

Waist Fit4%

“These were too small in the waist”

Thin3%

“Too thin”

Comfort-Overall3%

“The studs are uncomfortable”

Thickness2%

“the Fabrick is thick”

Advertised Vs Actual Product1%

“Not whats pictured”

Pockets/Compartments1%

“The pockets at the back are fake which took another star off”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall48%
Waist Fit11%
Length11%
Color5%
Inseam Fit5%
Thigh Fit4%
Material Quality3%
Hip Fit3%
Shape/Style2%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%