Skip to content
52

gold sunglasses

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 32% of clicks), but high returns (7.1%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 33Growth 62Conversion 29Competition 83Returns 20Price range 56Avg price 67Brand share 78Review moat 31Quality gap 50

Competition

Great32%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Great57%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Avg price

Good$13.98

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Good+39.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Good$7.49–$24.42

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay$159K

$159K/yr · 486K searches

Review moat

Okay3,369.51

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Okay2.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Bad7.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (32% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

35 falling

Sellers

41

Top-5 brand share

57%

Open market

39%

  • SOJOS20%
  • DIMENSIP14%
  • GUVIVI11%
  • FEISEDY7%
  • Dollger4%
  • livho4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$6K8%$13K12%$19K16%$25K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 59 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +39.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall19%

“Great price for quality”

Shape/Style18%

“Cute style”

Size-Overall12%

“Great sleek look and fit well”

Value For Money11%

“Money well spent”

Comfort-Overall8%

“Comfortable and cute”

Color7%

“the colors are so cute”

Weight Light5%

“Super lightweight”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Works as advertised”

Durability3%

“Durable Purchase”

Strength2%

“the folding part is very sturdy”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall20%

“Small in size”

Quality-Overall18%

“Low Quality”

Durability12%

“Broke very easily”

Value For Money7%

“Not a great value”

Strength5%

“flimsy plastic”

Material Quality4%

“Cheap material”

Color4%

“Theyre really dark”

Comfort-Overall2%

“Uncomfortable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“The size was not like described”

Weight Heavy2%

“They are a little bit heavier than I thought”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall60%
Shape/Style13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Quality-Overall5%
Color3%
Width3%
Value For Money2%
Material Quality2%
Strength1%
Defective Material/Parts1%