Skip to content
45

girls volleyball shorts

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.9%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 33Growth 26Conversion 11Competition 84Returns 21Price range 75Avg price 84Brand share 62Review moat 71Quality gap 28

Competition

Great31%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$18.41

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$7.95–$35.79

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good643.85

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good68%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay$157K

$157K/yr · 939K searches

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+0.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Bad7.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad0.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (31% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

19 rising

Sellers

186

Top-5 brand share

68%

Open market

27%

  • Nike36%
  • Haloumoning9%
  • Under Armour8%
  • Somaibo8%
  • Runhit7%
  • WIFFGO5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$5K6%$9K9%$14K12%$19K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 61 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +0.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
25K15KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall31%

“Fit perfect”

Quality-Overall14%

“they seem well made”

Comfort-Overall13%

“extremely comfortable to wear”

Exercise/Sports Suitability7%

“Great for sports”

Material Quality5%

“comfortable material”

Durability4%

“Durable and sporty”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity3%

“stretchy fabric”

Soft Feel3%

“Perfect shorts feels so silky”

Value For Money3%

“Great value for athletic shorts”

Pockets/Compartments2%

“The pockets are a nice bonus, and the high-waist design is flattering and comfortable”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall52%

“Way to short”

Quality-Overall9%

“Cheap”

Stitch/Finish/Polish7%

“Ripped down the seam on first wear”

Durability3%

“No longevity at all”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Longer than pictured”

Pilling/Linting2%

“Pilled after one wash”

Exercise/Sports Suitability2%

“not good for fishing lol”

Thin2%

“Very thin”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity2%

“Not super stretchy”

Material Quality1%

“Terrible material”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall67%
Waist Fit9%
Length7%
Material Quality3%
Thigh Fit3%
Inseam Fit3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%
Hip Fit1%
Comfort-Overall1%
Shape/Style1%