Skip to content
56

dickies long sleeve shirts for men

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 14% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 10Growth 64Conversion 10Competition 97Returns 42Price range 83Avg price 95Brand share 96Review moat 24Quality gap 50

Competition

Incredible14%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Incredible35%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Avg price

Incredible$27.32

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$6.00–$65.07

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+42.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Okay4.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Bad5,061.34

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad$41K

$41K/yr · 191K searches

Conversion

Bad0.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (14% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

72 rising

Sellers

136

Top-5 brand share

35%

Open market

61%

  • Dickies12%
  • OYGSieg8%
  • MAGCOMSEN6%
  • XWC5%
  • HovSiyla5%
  • Red Kap4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%1%$4122%$8233%$1K4%$2K1101001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 182 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 75 weeks — +42.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '25FebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall20%

“Fit is accurate”

Quality-Overall14%

“It is a nice quality shirt”

Value For Money11%

“Excellent value”

Comfort-Overall10%

“comfortable to wear”

Material Quality5%

“Nice and soft material”

Color5%

“I love this green color”

Weight Light4%

“Lightweight and breathable”

Breathability3%

“Lightweight and breathable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Just what I wanted”

Warmth3%

“Comfy and warm”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall29%

“Size down”

Thickness5%

“This shirt is a very thin”

Quality-Overall4%

“Poor quality”

Sleeve Fit4%

“Long sleeve shirt”

Color3%

“Already comes kinda faded looking”

Thin3%

“Too thin”

Material Quality3%

“Cheap material”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“not as advertised”

Smell1%

“a chemical odor permeated the entire room”

Neck Fit1%

“I do not like how tight the neck feels with the built in face mask”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall55%
Material Quality7%
Chest Fit7%
Sleeve Fit7%
Length5%
Thin3%
Color3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%
Waist Fit2%
Arm Fit2%