Skip to content
56

cotton yoga shorts

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 17% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 15Growth 91Conversion 14Competition 96Returns 22Price range 84Avg price 95Brand share 57Review moat 23Quality gap 65

Competition

Incredible17%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Incredible$23.58

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Great+99.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Great$7.02–$63.64

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good71%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Bad6,991.79

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Bad6.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Bad$61K

$61K/yr · 238K searches

Conversion

Bad1.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (17% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

37 rising

Sellers

67

Top-5 brand share

71%

Open market

25%

  • Jockey24%
  • baleaf22%
  • Bikewa10%
  • wirarpa8%
  • Molasus6%
  • Heathyoga4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$1K4%$2K6%$4K8%$5K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 146 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +99.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 6.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall20%

“Fit as expected”

Comfort-Overall20%

“is comfortable for me”

Soft Feel9%

“Butter soft”

Quality-Overall6%

“Fair quality for price paid”

Value For Money5%

“Money well spent”

Pockets/Compartments4%

“I love the pockets”

Material Quality4%

“Lightweight material”

Exercise/Sports Suitability3%

“Great exercise pants”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“As advertised”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity2%

“just enough stretch”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall19%

“Runs large”

Thickness7%

“the material is on the thinner side”

Material Quality6%

“Not impressed with material”

Transparency5%

“you can definitely see through them when you bend over”

Thin4%

“Thin material”

Quality-Overall4%

“Low quality”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity2%

“Are not clear when stretched”

Pockets/Compartments2%

“Tiny pocket”

Comfort-Overall2%

“I cant wear them”

Smell2%

“they smell like cat urine”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall48%
Waist Fit9%
Length8%
Material Quality7%
Thigh Fit5%
Thin4%
Inseam Fit2%
Hip Fit2%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%
Transparency2%