Skip to content
56

cotton bike shorts women

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +120.1% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 15Growth 95Conversion 13Competition 87Returns 36Price range 74Avg price 83Brand share 70Review moat 22Quality gap 60

Growth

Incredible+120.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Great28%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$18.37

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$5.94–$40.53

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good63%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Okay4.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Bad8,902.97

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad$59K

$59K/yr · 311K searches

Conversion

Bad1.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (28% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

38 falling

Sellers

65

Top-5 brand share

63%

Open market

33%

  • Jockey24%
  • wirarpa20%
  • Molasus10%
  • Leafigure5%
  • FULLSOFT4%
  • Hanes4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$1K4%$2K6%$4K8%$5K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 87 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +120.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 6.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall22%

“fit as expected”

Comfort-Overall20%

“so comfortable to wear”

Soft Feel11%

“Material is soft and comfortable”

Value For Money5%

“Money well spent”

Quality-Overall5%

“Excellent quality”

Pockets/Compartments4%

“Love the pockets”

Material Quality4%

“Lightweight material”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity3%

“Nice stretch fits well”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“As advertised”

Exercise/Sports Suitability2%

“Great workout shorts”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall15%

“Too short”

Transparency8%

“Completely see through/ transparent”

Thickness7%

“The material is decently thick”

Material Quality6%

“the material is not good”

Smell5%

“Weird Smell”

Quality-Overall4%

“Low quality”

Thin4%

“Thin Material”

Pockets/Compartments2%

“No pockets”

Thigh Fit2%

“tighter in the thigh so nothing rubs”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity2%

“not a whole lot of elasticity there”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall45%
Length9%
Material Quality8%
Waist Fit8%
Thin7%
Thigh Fit4%
Transparency3%
Inseam Fit3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%
Quality-Overall1%