Skip to content

chicago bulls shorts

Worth a look54/100

chicago bulls shorts shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 15% of clicks), but a small market ($8K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market/yr

$8K

Growth (1y)

+200.9%

Products

134

Brands

44

was 14 a year ago

Sellers

249

Price range

$9.48–$62.97

Returns

4.1%

Rating

4.5★

54/100

Worth a look

Scored 54/100 across market size, growth, competition, quality gap, and returns.

Market sizeGrowthCompetitionQuality gapReturns
Market size
0
×0.30
Growth
77
×0.30
Competition
100
×0.20
Quality gap
43
×0.10
Returns
67
×0.10

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +200.9% year over year.
13K6KHoliday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Holiday '25Spike '26Jul '24Nov '24Mar '25Jul '25Nov '25Mar '26

Seasonality

Monthly demand index across the year — 1.00 is average.

Peak months: Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.3×

Competition

40%Nike
  • Nike40%
  • G Gradual8%
  • Amazon Essentials7%
  • Jordan6%
  • JMIERR6%
  • Real Essentials3%
  • Other (38 brands)30%

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (15% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen. 44 brands and 249 sellers compete here.

Brands

44 rising

was 14 a year ago

Sellers

249

Top 5 brand share

67%

#ProductBrandPriceRatingReviewsClick shareTrend

Product shelf

All 134 tracked products in this niche.

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall20%

“Fit as youd expect”

Comfort-Overall18%

“Really comfortable”

Value For Money12%

“Great DEAL”

Quality-Overall11%

“These appear to be well made”

Pockets/Compartments4%

“Good pockets”

Exercise/Sports Suitability3%

“Best sports shorts”

Material Quality3%

“High quality and thick material”

Soft Feel3%

“Soft material and comfortable if the proper size is used”

Weight Light3%

“Very light and breathable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“As advertised”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall24%

“BUY A SIZE LARGER”

Quality-Overall7%

“Very cheap quality”

Material Quality5%

“Material is also very cheap”

Pockets/Compartments4%

“they came with no pockets”

Thickness4%

“Thin”

Length3%

“They are very long”

Transparency2%

“see through”

Stitch/Finish/Polish2%

“Poor stitching”

Durability2%

“Not very durable”

Zipper Quality2%

“So far just 1 zipper doesnt work :”

Top return reasons

  • Size-Overall48%
  • Waist Fit11%
  • Length10%
  • Material Quality8%
  • Inseam Fit5%
  • Thin3%
  • Thigh Fit3%
  • Advertised Vs Actual Product2%
  • Hip Fit2%
  • Quality-Overall1%

Data scraped July 8, 2026 · Marketplace baseline: 4.4★ avg rating · $22.71 median price · 2.2% median returns across 13,812 tracked niches.