Skip to content
54

butt lifting shorts

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($19.04 avg), but weak search conversion (0.5%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 28Growth 65Conversion 7Competition 84Returns 21Price range 77Avg price 85Brand share 75Review moat 46Quality gap 67

Avg price

Great$19.04

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great31%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Great$8.70–$36.78

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Great60%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Good+43.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Okay1,922.12

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay$119K

$119K/yr · 1.2M searches

Returns

Bad6.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad0.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (31% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

29 falling

Sellers

32

Top-5 brand share

60%

Open market

35%

  • CHRLEISURE26%
  • ATHVOTAR17%
  • Niipty7%
  • Heathyoga5%
  • Unthewe5%
  • TomTiger5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$4K6%$7K9%$11K12%$14K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 68 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +43.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
50K30KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall19%

“not too tight”

Comfort-Overall16%

“SO COMFORTABLE”

Soft Feel7%

“The fabric feels soft”

Quality-Overall7%

“So comfy great quality love the pattern BUY”

Color5%

“Cute colors”

Exercise/Sports Suitability5%

“Good workout shorts”

Material Quality4%

“Amazing material”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity4%

“has good stretch”

Shape/Style4%

“Flattering”

Value For Money3%

“Good deal”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall30%

“They run large”

Thickness4%

“They are not as thick as Aurola or Voyjoy”

Comfort-Overall4%

“Way too tight and highly uncomfortable”

Material Quality3%

“Cheap Material”

Transparency3%

“i was scared that theyd be see through”

Functionality-Overall3%

“Didnt do much”

Quality-Overall2%

“Its cheap. cost”

Thigh Fit2%

“They tend to go a bit up my thigh”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Not as described”

Exercise/Sports Suitability2%

“I could not do leg exercises or squat in these without my underwear showing”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall52%
Waist Fit9%
Thigh Fit9%
Length8%
Material Quality3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Inseam Fit3%
Transparency2%
Shape/Style2%
Hip Fit2%