Skip to content
52

blue apron

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 29% of clicks), but a deep review moat (4,825 avg reviews) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 28Growth 32Conversion 52Competition 86Returns 49Price range 70Avg price 79Brand share 72Review moat 25Quality gap 40

Competition

Great29%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$16.53

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good62%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Good$5.94–$36.13

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good4.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Okay3.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+5.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Okay$122K

$122K/yr · 176K searches

Review moat

Bad4,824.59

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (29% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

38 rising

Sellers

45

Top-5 brand share

62%

Open market

34%

  • Utopia Kitchen19%
  • Syntus19%
  • Avalon Kitchen13%
  • BeLuyi6%
  • Chef Works5%
  • AFUN4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$2K4%$5K6%$7K8%$10K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 68 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 102 weeks — +5.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
35K25KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25DecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 8.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall21%

“Excellent for the kitchen and good quality”

Value For Money11%

“They are affordable”

Size-Overall10%

“The fit is comfortable for an average size”

Material Quality5%

“Good material and fits comfortably”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“It was as advertised”

Pockets/Compartments4%

“I like the pockets”

Comfort-Overall3%

“Comfortable”

Water Resistance3%

“water resistant”

Color3%

“Perfect Color”

Durability3%

“They are durable”

What buyers complain about

Water Resistance15%

“NOT waterproof”

Material Quality11%

“I didnt like the material its made of”

Quality-Overall10%

“Not well made at all”

Thickness9%

“It is super thick”

Pockets/Compartments5%

“All of the pockets are very shallow”

Strap/String Quality5%

“Loose Straps”

Size-Overall4%

“They run small”

Thin3%

“Too thin, needs to be thicker material”

Value For Money3%

“Not worth it”

Absorbency2%

“definitely not absorbent”

Top return reasons

Material Quality27%
Size-Overall20%
Length8%
Thin8%
Color7%
Quality-Overall5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Water Resistance3%
Value For Money2%
Pockets/Compartments2%