Skip to content
55

black spandex shorts

Worth a look

Shows no brand lock-in (top 5 brands take 35% of clicks), but a small market ($65K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 16Growth 55Conversion 18Competition 93Returns 33Price range 72Avg price 80Brand share 96Review moat 44Quality gap 57

Brand share

Incredible35%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great22%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$16.84

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$6.71–$36.57

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Good+28.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Okay2,114.85

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Okay5.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad1.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad$65K

$65K/yr · 267K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (22% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

49 rising

Sellers

60

Top-5 brand share

35%

Open market

60%

  • CRZ YOGA10%
  • YNNTHY7%
  • FULLSOFT7%
  • Leafigure6%
  • Unthewe5%
  • FallSweet5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$1K4%$3K6%$4K8%$5K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 88 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 36 weeks — +28.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KHoliday '25Spike '26Nov '25Dec '25Jan '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall21%

“fit as expected”

Comfort-Overall18%

“super comfortable to wear”

Soft Feel11%

“Material is soft and comfortable”

Value For Money6%

“Great Value”

Quality-Overall5%

“Fair quality for price paid”

Pockets/Compartments5%

“love the pockets”

Material Quality4%

“lightweight material”

Exercise/Sports Suitability4%

“Great workout shorts”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity3%

“Nice stretch fits well”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“As advertised”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall16%

“size down”

Transparency8%

“SEE THROUGH”

Thickness6%

“the material is on the thinner side”

Material Quality6%

“the material is not good”

Quality-Overall4%

“Cheaply made”

Thin3%

“Thin material”

Smell3%

“Chemical Smell”

Exercise/Sports Suitability2%

“Not for working out”

Compression2%

“There isn't really any compression they don't really hold anything tight like i was hoping”

Thigh Fit2%

“they were too tight around the thigh for me so I returned them”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall45%
Length12%
Waist Fit7%
Material Quality6%
Thin5%
Thigh Fit5%
Inseam Fit4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%
Transparency2%
Hip Fit1%