Skip to content
50

black shades men

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($52.82 avg), but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($8.70–$430.54) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 44Growth 51Conversion 32Competition 54Returns 57Price range 20Avg price 92Brand share 72Review moat 33Quality gap 47

Avg price

Great$52.82

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good62%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Returns

Good2.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Good52%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Good+22.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay$233K

$233K/yr · 173K searches

Review moat

Okay3,217.88

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Okay2.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Bad$8.70–$430.54

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 52% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

22 falling

Sellers

61

Top-5 brand share

62%

Open market

31%

  • Sunier20%
  • KALIYADI12%
  • EYLRIM10%
  • Versace10%
  • LINVO10%
  • GFUIARA7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$12K10%$23K15%$35K20%$47K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 33 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +22.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall23%

“Solid quality”

Value For Money18%

“Great value”

Size-Overall11%

“liked the size”

Comfort-Overall7%

“Comfortable fit”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“as advertised”

Shape/Style4%

“Comfort and stylish”

Color4%

“The quality and color are great”

Durability3%

“they are durable”

Weight Light2%

“The frame is lightweight”

Design-Overall2%

“The design is really cool”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall14%

“uncomfortable fit”

Quality-Overall12%

“Poor quality”

Durability11%

“Broke easily”

Value For Money8%

“Waste of money”

Blue Light Filter5%

“No blue light filter”

Color4%

“Dark”

Functionality-Overall4%

“not effective”

Strength3%

“too fragile”

Lenses3%

“However the lens smidge easily”

Material Quality2%

“Poor shipping and handling material”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall56%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Shape/Style4%
Value For Money4%
Functionality-Overall4%
Quality-Overall4%
Blue Light Filter2%
Comfort-Overall2%
Color2%
Defective Material/Parts2%