Skip to content
52

black shades

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 28% of clicks), but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($6.09–$430.54) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 26Growth 57Conversion 31Competition 87Returns 31Price range 20Avg price 86Brand share 86Review moat 25Quality gap 50

Competition

Great28%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Great49%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Avg price

Great$19.39

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Good+30.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Okay2.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Okay5.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Okay$107K

$107K/yr · 222K searches

Review moat

Okay3,981.04

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Bad$6.09–$430.54

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (28% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

38 falling

Sellers

50

Top-5 brand share

49%

Open market

42%

  • Dollger12%
  • miyya10%
  • aisswzber9%
  • Joopin9%
  • LYZOIT9%
  • SOJOS8%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$2K4%$4K6%$6K8%$9K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 69 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +30.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall20%

“liked the size”

Quality-Overall18%

“are good quality UV”

Value For Money12%

“Good value for money”

Shape/Style9%

“Perfect shape”

Comfort-Overall7%

“So comfortable”

Color5%

“Good shades”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Exactly as described”

Weight Light4%

“They feel lightweight on the face”

Durability3%

“durable and good quality and i love that they are a snug fit and they even come with a pouch and cleaning rag”

Strength3%

“The glasses are sturdy”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall26%

“Really big”

Durability12%

“dont last”

Quality-Overall9%

“Not well made”

Value For Money7%

“Waste of money”

Material Quality4%

“Cheap material”

Strength3%

“flimsy”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Everything is not what is advertised”

Comfort-Overall2%

“Very uncomfortable to wear”

Weight Heavy2%

“Bulky”

Connectivity-Overall2%

“The Bluetooth/connectivity is horrible”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall67%
Shape/Style8%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Quality-Overall3%
Value For Money3%
Color2%
Material Quality1%
Width1%
Functionality-Overall1%
Comfort-Overall1%