Skip to content
49

basketball shoes

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.1%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 72Growth 13Conversion 2Competition 97Returns 17Price range 72Avg price 89Brand share 46Review moat 36Quality gap 48

Competition

Incredible11%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$60.45

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good$790K

$790K/yr · 9.3M searches

Price range

Good$24.27–$129.79

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay78%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay2,892.66

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Bad7.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Bad-24.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (11% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

27 rising

Sellers

325

Top-5 brand share

78%

Open market

19%

  • Nike32%
  • PEAK16%
  • adidas14%
  • Under Armour10%
  • Reebok6%
  • ANTA4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%1%$8K2%$16K3%$24K4%$32K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 239 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -24.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
1.8M1.3MPrime Day '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Comfort-Overall21%

“So comfortable”

Size-Overall20%

“Hes fits all his equipment”

Quality-Overall11%

“Awesome Quality”

Value For Money11%

“Good Value”

Durability5%

“Durable material”

Color4%

“Cool Colors”

Exercise/Sports Suitability3%

“These are the best gym shoes ever made I used them when I was roofing”

Shape/Style2%

“They were stylish”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“As advertised”

Storage Capacity2%

“Lots of room”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall27%

“Too big”

Durability9%

“Started falling apart after 2 weeks”

Quality-Overall6%

“Not as high quality either”

Product Condition6%

“Looked worn when arrived”

Comfort-Overall4%

“Not comfortable”

Stitch/Finish/Polish2%

“Appears to be a sewing defect in one of the shoes I got”

Material Quality2%

“Cheaply made”

Width2%

“The extra wide is so extra either”

Pain Relief-Overall2%

“I experienced significant pain in the left heel”

Color2%

“Red Dye bleeds onto foot and sock”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall31%
Feet Fit30%
Width13%
Length11%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%
Comfort-Overall2%
Color2%
Material Quality1%
Shape/Style1%
Product Condition1%