Skip to content
55

aviator

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($18.68 avg), but a deep review moat (5,466 avg reviews) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 42Growth 57Conversion 33Competition 69Returns 42Price range 78Avg price 84Brand share 83Review moat 24Quality gap 52

Avg price

Great$18.68

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Great52%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Price range

Great$8.21–$39.61

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good43%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Good+30.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay$222K

$222K/yr · 453K searches

Returns

Okay4.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Okay2.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Bad5,466.38

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 43% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

28 falling

Sellers

31

Top-5 brand share

52%

Open market

43%

  • J+S14%
  • livho14%
  • phikttu11%
  • KALIYADI8%
  • SOJOS6%
  • LUENX5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$9K8%$18K12%$27K16%$35K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 42 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +30.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money19%

“they are affordable”

Quality-Overall19%

“Decent quality”

Size-Overall13%

“Fit as expected”

Comfort-Overall9%

“These glasses are very comfortable”

Shape/Style7%

“I love the shape”

Weight Light7%

“The frames are lightweight and comfortable”

Color5%

“colors are very pretty”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Better than expected”

Strength3%

“Very sturdy and great sunglasses”

Durability3%

“Both feel durable enough for regular use and travel”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall22%

“Bad quality”

Size-Overall16%

“Super small”

Durability14%

“Broke after first wear”

Value For Money8%

“Not Worth the Price”

Strength5%

“Super fragile”

Material Quality4%

“Low quality material”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“misleading product photos”

Color1%

“I wish they were a bit darker”

Functionality-Overall1%

“Does not work for me”

Weight Heavy1%

“they're extremely heavy and stiff”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall64%
Shape/Style10%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Quality-Overall5%
Color3%
Value For Money2%
Width2%
Material Quality2%
Strength1%
Defective Material/Parts1%