Skip to content
38

alpaca scarf

Skip it

Soft demand (-78.6% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 5Growth 0Conversion 9Competition 77Returns 33Price range 63Avg price 92Brand share 58Review moat 85Quality gap 38

Avg price

Great$52.54

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great299.1

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Great38%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Good$14.92–$150.00

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good70%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Okay5.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad0.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad$19K

$19K/yr · 51K searches

Growth

Bad-78.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (38% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

15 rising

Sellers

17

Top-5 brand share

70%

Open market

24%

  • Inca Fashions32%
  • ALPAKITAS16%
  • Maloca Alpaca9%
  • Generic8%
  • Evolution Knitwear6%
  • GreaterGood6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$5716%$1K9%$2K12%$2K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 39 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -78.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 32.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Soft Feel24%

“Buttery soft material”

Warmth11%

“soft AND warm”

Comfort-Overall11%

“Comfortable”

Color9%

“Colors are beautiful”

Weight Light7%

“Not bulky”

Gifting Purpose6%

“Very popular christmas gift”

Quality-Overall6%

“High quality”

Value For Money3%

“Worth the money”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“As advertised”

Weather Proof2%

“Great for cold climate”

What buyers complain about

Warmth13%

“Did not keep feet warm”

Thickness11%

“WAY TOO THIN”

Quality-Overall8%

“Cheaply made”

Comfort-Overall8%

“not cozy”

Thin8%

“Feel thin and cheap”

Value For Money7%

“A bit, more expensive,”

Smell6%

“Had a slight odor from being boxed”

Size-Overall4%

“Also they are huge”

Material Quality4%

“Low quality fabric”

Gap/Hole3%

“the tire developed a hole”

Top return reasons

Color20%
Thin16%
Size-Overall13%
Material Quality12%
Length9%
Value For Money4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Warmth3%
Quality-Overall3%
Shape/Style2%