Skip to content
57

90s sunglasses

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 26% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 33Growth 70Conversion 29Competition 89Returns 28Price range 76Avg price 69Brand share 82Review moat 37Quality gap 50

Competition

Great26%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Great53%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Price range

Great$6.67–$42.15

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+51.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Good$14.27

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay2,811.33

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay$159K

$159K/yr · 486K searches

Conversion

Okay2.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Okay5.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (26% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

37 rising

Sellers

40

Top-5 brand share

53%

Open market

42%

  • SOJOS26%
  • FEISEDY8%
  • KUGUAOK8%
  • GUVIVI6%
  • ViewJoy5%
  • BUTABY5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$3K4%$6K6%$10K8%$13K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 84 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +51.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall20%

“Solid quality for the price”

Shape/Style15%

“Love the shape”

Value For Money13%

“Fair price”

Size-Overall11%

“they fit like a charm”

Comfort-Overall9%

“Comfortable and cute”

Weight Light6%

“These are the perfect lightweight sunglasses”

Color6%

“Love the color and shape”

Durability3%

“they still look brand new”

Strength3%

“Very sturdy and great sunglasses”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Just like advertised”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall26%

“To big”

Quality-Overall16%

“Not well made”

Durability10%

“Easy to break”

Value For Money5%

“Waste of money”

Strength4%

“super flimsy”

Material Quality4%

“material is not the same as the dupe”

Color2%

“Color was not as expected”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“False advertising”

Shape/Style1%

“Just didn't like the style on me”

Comfort-Overall1%

“Terribly uncomfortable”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall62%
Shape/Style13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Quality-Overall4%
Color3%
Width3%
Value For Money2%
Material Quality1%
Defective Material/Parts1%
Strength1%