Skip to content
50

70s sunglasses for women

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 22% of clicks), but a small market ($46K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 12Growth 44Conversion 26Competition 93Returns 23Price range 67Avg price 76Brand share 88Review moat 47Quality gap 48

Competition

Great22%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Great47%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Avg price

Great$15.59

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$5.77–$133.32

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay1,773.55

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Okay+15.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Okay2.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Bad6.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Bad$46K

$46K/yr · 145K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (22% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

45 falling

Sellers

57

Top-5 brand share

47%

Open market

49%

  • FEISEDY21%
  • GUVIVI9%
  • SOJOS6%
  • Dollger6%
  • VANLINKER5%
  • Tskestvy4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$9214%$2K6%$3K8%$4K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 91 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 48 weeks — +15.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSpike '26Aug '25Oct '25Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall18%

“best quality glasses Ive had in forever”

Shape/Style16%

“Cute style”

Size-Overall13%

“The fit is comfortable”

Value For Money13%

“GOOD VALUE FOR THE PRICE”

Comfort-Overall9%

“Comfortable and cute”

Color7%

“love the variety of colors”

Weight Light5%

“Lightweight and comfortable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Exactly what I ordered :”

Durability3%

“Durable Purchase”

Strength3%

“The frames feel sturdy”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall20%

“To big”

Quality-Overall17%

“Not well made”

Durability12%

“Broke fast”

Value For Money8%

“Waste of money”

Strength5%

“Cheap and flimsy”

Material Quality4%

“Tiny and low quality material”

Color3%

“Color was not as expected”

Comfort-Overall2%

“Uncomfortable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product1%

“The size was not like described”

Shape/Style1%

“sometimes struggle to find a shape that I like”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall62%
Shape/Style13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Quality-Overall4%
Color4%
Width3%
Value For Money2%
Material Quality1%
Defective Material/Parts1%
Strength1%