Skip to content
52

70s glasses

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 20% of clicks), but high returns (7.1%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 28Growth 42Conversion 28Competition 95Returns 20Price range 62Avg price 62Brand share 92Review moat 49Quality gap 50

Competition

Great20%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Great43%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Avg price

Good$13.49

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$5.20–$31.09

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay1,579.03

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Okay+13.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Okay$118K

$118K/yr · 392K searches

Conversion

Okay2.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Bad7.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (20% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

52 falling

Sellers

60

Top-5 brand share

43%

Open market

51%

  • FEISEDY16%
  • Pibupibu8%
  • Dollger7%
  • Geopty6%
  • Tskestvy6%
  • SUNOVELTIES5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$2K4%$5K6%$7K8%$9K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 110 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +13.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall19%

“AMAZING QUALITY”

Shape/Style14%

“Very flattering”

Value For Money12%

“Great deal”

Size-Overall11%

“The fit is comfortable”

Color9%

“Awesome shades”

Comfort-Overall7%

“Comfortable and cute”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Exactly as pictured”

Weight Light4%

“the frames are lightweight yet sturdy”

Durability3%

“have held up well”

Strength3%

“Actually a sturdy set of sunglasses”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall24%

“Small in size”

Quality-Overall20%

“Cheaply made”

Durability8%

“Broke very easily”

Color5%

“Color was not as expected”

Strength5%

“flimsy plastic”

Material Quality4%

“Cheap material”

Value For Money4%

“Not a great value”

Comfort-Overall3%

“not very comfortable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“There could be something wrong with the description selection”

Weight Heavy1%

“They are a little bit heavier than I thought”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall61%
Shape/Style11%
Quality-Overall5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Color4%
Width3%
Value For Money2%
Material Quality2%
Defective Material/Parts1%
Comfort-Overall1%