Skip to content
52

viking hair

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.1%), but a small market ($47K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 12Growth 26Conversion 66Competition 57Returns 94Price range 45Avg price 74Brand share 59Review moat 38Quality gap 84

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Good$14.87

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good70%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good51%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Okay$4.82–$23.27

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,747.41

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Okay+1.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$47K

$47K/yr · 53K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 51% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

20 falling

Sellers

21

Top-5 brand share

70%

Open market

27%

  • SMOOTH VIKING BEARD CARE40%
  • NTYNTY10%
  • REECHO8%
  • WILLBOND7%
  • inSowni4%
  • Viking Revolution3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$5K20%$9K30%$14K40%$19K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 29 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 20 weeks — +1.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K600Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell15%

“Very clean fragrance”

Quality-Overall13%

“A good variety”

Value For Money6%

“Great for the Price”

Ease Of Use5%

“Easy to use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Just what I needed”

Color5%

“I love the colors”

Hair Styling4%

“helps to style”

Texture/Consistency-Overall3%

“Easy way to add texture”

Shape/Style2%

“fun and stylish accessory”

Size-Overall2%

“I also love the varying sizes”

What buyers complain about

Smell13%

“leaves a scent that is terrible”

Hair Related7%

“dont hold securely in my hair”

Functionality-Overall6%

“It doesnt work”

Durability5%

“Threader broke with the first use”

Texture/Consistency-Overall4%

“Does not add texture”

Ingredients-Overall3%

“The ELEPHANT in the room: many low star ratings are concerned about the chemical ingredients in the product itself”

Size-Overall3%

“Smaller than expected”

Quality-Overall3%

“results weren't perfect”

Suitability Straight Hair3%

“they do not bend to the hair they fall out immediately”

Thickness3%

“this is just like thick water”

Top return reasons

Smell16%
Advertised Vs Actual Product15%
Functionality-Overall12%
Suitability Short Hair10%
Ingredients-Overall4%
Size-Overall4%
Texture/Consistency-Overall3%
Color3%
Leak-Proof3%
Defective Material/Parts3%