Skip to content
24

st patricks day nails

Skip it

Soft demand (-98.8% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 5Growth 0Conversion 18Competition 0Returns 64Price range 0Avg price 19Brand share 0Review moat 96Quality gap 97

Quality gap

Incredible3.8★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Incredible82.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Good2.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Bad$6.71

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Bad1.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad$18K

$18K/yr · 188K searches

Growth

Bad-98.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad100%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Price range

Bad$5.98–$7.59

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products capture 100% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

4 rising

Sellers

5

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • KRTBKR32%
  • WBRRFJJ25%
  • BSBTBZ23%
  • CEWEWP21%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$2K20%$4K30%$5K40%$7K101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 4 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 65 weeks — -98.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
35K25KSpike '25Spike '26AprMayJunAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Feb, Mar · busiest ÷ quietest = 241.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Durability25%

“durable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product17%

“They came as advertised”

Ease Of Application13%

“Easy to apply super cute”

Value For Money13%

“Ok for the price”

Design-Overall13%

“I love the design”

Quality-Overall10%

“are pretty good quality”

Size-Overall10%

“Fits well”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall23%

“look cheap”

Size-Overall17%

“sizing was all messed up”

Adhesion/Stickiness13%

“No glue”

Durability10%

“And came off numerous times”

Functionality-Overall9%

“Would not stay with the Jelly tabs”

Thickness8%

“so thin most of them split”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“Not whats pictured”

Color6%

“I wish the green”

Shape/Style3%

“They arent shaped correctly”

Strength2%

“thin and flimsy did not even stay on for 1 night”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall26%
Advertised Vs Actual Product25%
Quality-Overall11%
Adhesion/Stickiness7%
Thin6%
Design-Overall6%
Paint Quality5%
Color4%
Shape/Style4%
Ease Of Application2%