Skip to content
43

puracy hand soap refill

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 20Growth 32Conversion 88Competition 48Returns 99Price range 43Avg price 22Brand share 0Review moat 24Quality gap 50

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay56%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Okay$3.11–$23.91

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Okay+5.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad4,934.68

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Bad$7.79

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Bad$81K

$81K/yr · 102K searches

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 56% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

5 falling

Sellers

569

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • 365 by Whole Foods Market90%
  • Clean Revolution5%
  • Dial3%
  • Molly's Suds1%
  • ATTITUDE1%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$4K10%$8K15%$12K20%$16K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 22 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 98 weeks — +5.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KPrime Day '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26DecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb, Mar, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell34%

“Mild citrus scent youll love”

Quality-Overall8%

“Good quality soap”

Value For Money8%

“Good price”

Cleansing6%

“Cleans just as well as other soaps do”

Ease Of Cleaning6%

“Its completely clean”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“does the job”

Allergies3%

“no allergy issues”

Lather3%

“Lathers up nice with a fresh scent”

Soft Feel2%

“Gentle on the skin”

Toxic/Chemical Free2%

“Sulfate free and gentle, though horrible smell”

What buyers complain about

Smell38%

“Not fragrance free”

Moist/Dry7%

“maybe a little drying”

Ease Of Cleaning4%

“Poor cleanser”

Dispensing Mechanism4%

“Poor dispenser pump”

Allergies3%

“itch for several minutes after using them”

Leak-Proof3%

“One had a leak in the bottom of the bottle”

Functionality-Overall3%

“it does a poor job at it”

Value For Money3%

“Bad for money value”

Dilute/Watery2%

“it was very watery compared to Mollys Suds”

Ease Of Use2%

“It is so wasteful to not be able to reuse the dispenser”

Top return reasons

Smell30%
Leak-Proof18%
Advertised Vs Actual Product12%
Motor Power5%
Dispensing Mechanism5%
Size-Overall4%
Dilute/Watery3%
Value For Money3%
Moist/Dry2%
Ingredients-Overall2%