Skip to content
58

polygel nail forms

Worth a look

Shows no brand lock-in (top 5 brands take 51% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 35Growth 37Conversion 34Competition 81Returns 75Price range 52Avg price 48Brand share 84Review moat 69Quality gap 67

Brand share

Great51%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great34%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Returns

Great2.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good729.23

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$5.14–$25.88

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Okay$11.80

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Okay+9.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Okay$167K

$167K/yr · 515K searches

Conversion

Okay2.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (34% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

30 rising

Sellers

33

Top-5 brand share

51%

Open market

45%

  • MGART12%
  • modelones11%
  • GELLAKTIK10%
  • YOKE FELLOW10%
  • gelike ec7%
  • BOMOQING4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$5K6%$10K9%$15K12%$20K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 48 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +9.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSpike '25Holiday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use24%

“Easy to Work With”

Quality-Overall16%

“Its a nice set overall”

Shape/Style10%

“Great shape,”

Size-Overall9%

“Great size selection and quick results,”

Value For Money5%

“Great deal”

Design-Overall4%

“are very creative with their designs”

Durability3%

“They are extremely durable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“As described”

Ease Of Application2%

“The gel applies smoothly”

Thickness2%

“these leave a thick free edge”

What buyers complain about

Ease Of Use17%

“A little hard to use at first”

Size-Overall16%

“Very short”

Thickness5%

“I was also worried that they were going to be really thick”

Adhesion/Stickiness5%

“which I have gotten chemical burns from the glue”

Functionality-Overall5%

“no effective or helpful”

Shape/Style5%

“hard to shape”

Quality-Overall4%

“Not very good quality”

Value For Money4%

“Not worth it”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“The pictures are very deceiving”

Durability2%

“not like a week type wear”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall22%
Shape/Style17%
Advertised Vs Actual Product13%
Functionality-Overall13%
Ease Of Use6%
Adhesion/Stickiness4%
Quality-Overall4%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Material Quality2%
Strength2%