Skip to content
51

polygel nail colors

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.2%), but soft demand (-19.1% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 16Growth 15Conversion 27Competition 82Returns 91Price range 75Avg price 78Brand share 60Review moat 24Quality gap 73

Returns

Great1.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Great33%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$16.13

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$4.03–$47.99

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good69%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Okay2.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Bad5,662.71

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad$65K

$65K/yr · 186K searches

Growth

Bad-19.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (33% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

23 rising

Sellers

60

Top-5 brand share

69%

Open market

22%

  • Makartt19%
  • Gelish16%
  • GAOY15%
  • modelones11%
  • beetles Gel Polish8%
  • JEWHITENY8%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$2K6%$4K9%$6K12%$8K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 56 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -19.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall18%

“If you are looking for a quality product that is affordable”

Ease Of Use15%

“Easy to Use”

Adhesion/Stickiness9%

“Glue well”

Color9%

“Colors are beautiful”

Value For Money8%

“Excellent value”

Durability8%

“Extremely durable”

Ease Of Application3%

“Easy to apply”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“as advertised”

Efficiency2%

“Really effective at filing off luminary”

Thickness2%

“Super thick”

What buyers complain about

Adhesion/Stickiness12%

“doesn't adhere well”

Durability11%

“Break easily”

Functionality-Overall6%

“Does not work well”

Ease Of Use6%

“Not easy to use”

Size-Overall5%

“Slightly too big”

Value For Money5%

“Waste of money”

Quality-Overall4%

“Not the best product”

Allergies4%

“Allergic reaction”

Smell4%

“Horrible chemical smell”

Thickness4%

“when it does its one big blob thick”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall20%
Adhesion/Stickiness12%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Size-Overall8%
Ease Of Use5%
Quality-Overall4%
Defective Material/Parts4%
Color4%
Leak-Proof3%
Value For Money3%