Skip to content
50

pastel nail polish

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.3%), but soft demand (-35.4% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 50Growth 7Conversion 48Competition 71Returns 89Price range 84Avg price 75Brand share 26Review moat 19Quality gap 57

Returns

Great1.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great$3.11–$86.56

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Great$14.94

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Good43%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good$279K

$279K/yr · 492K searches

Conversion

Okay3.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay89%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Bad14,144.6

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-35.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 43% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

15 falling

Sellers

50

Top-5 brand share

89%

Open market

8%

  • beetles Gel Polish56%
  • GAOY14%
  • Born Pretty9%
  • VANREESA6%
  • modelones4%
  • GELLEN2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (9 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$11K8%$22K12%$34K16%$45K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 43 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 12 weeks — -35.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KApr '26May '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Color45%

“Colors are as described”

Value For Money7%

“Good price”

Quality-Overall7%

“Good quality”

Stitch/Finish/Polish4%

“A perfect finish”

Ease Of Application4%

“Great application”

Durability3%

“Very durable”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy to use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“As advertised”

Paint Quality2%

“Cures well, pretty easy to paint on”

Coverage1%

“Great coverage”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall17%

“The bottlers were super small”

Allergies9%

“ALLERGIC REACTION”

Color9%

“Ugly colors”

Quality-Overall6%

“Cheap quality”

Thickness5%

“Its also a little on the thicker side”

Leak-Proof5%

“Leaking”

Durability4%

“These dont last a week”

Paint Quality4%

“Quality of paint was poor”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“looks nothing like the photo”

Moist/Dry2%

“didn't dry well”

Top return reasons

Color31%
Size-Overall16%
Advertised Vs Actual Product10%
Leak-Proof7%
Functionality-Overall6%
Quality-Overall6%
Paint Quality4%
Moist/Dry2%
Thickness2%
Adhesion/Stickiness2%