Skip to content
66

monomer acrylic nail liquid

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.6%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 96Growth 24Conversion 55Competition 82Returns 97Price range 50Avg price 95Brand share 50Review moat 35Quality gap 63

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Incredible$3.1M

$3.1M/yr · 2.7M searches

Avg price

Incredible$24.72

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great33%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Good4.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay75%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Good$4.48–$172.84

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,954.39

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-1.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (33% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

16 rising

Sellers

53

Top-5 brand share

75%

Open market

19%

  • Mia Secret25%
  • SAVILAND17%
  • VANSISOS13%
  • MakarttPro11%
  • Young Nails10%
  • DeEnti5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$62K4%$124K6%$186K8%$248K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 49 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -1.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
90K70KPrime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall24%

“The powders are high quality”

Smell10%

“Does not smell bad”

Ease Of Use10%

“was easy to work with”

Adhesion/Stickiness9%

“It also offers excellent adhesion”

Value For Money8%

“Good value for money”

Efficiency4%

“It works beautifully”

Durability4%

“it is very durable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Item is as described”

Color2%

“Natural-looking colors”

Ease Of Application2%

“Its easy to apply”

What buyers complain about

Smell27%

“Strong Chemical Smell”

Size-Overall12%

“SUPER small”

Moist/Dry7%

“Would not dry”

Adhesion/Stickiness6%

“Doesn't stick very well”

Quality-Overall5%

“terrible quality and the smell is unbearable”

Ease Of Use4%

“not user friendly”

Value For Money4%

“Price went up significantly”

Leak-Proof3%

“It leaks after you open it”

Functionality-Overall2%

“Does not work well”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Not like it's shown in picture”

Top return reasons

Smell15%
Functionality-Overall13%
Adhesion/Stickiness12%
Size-Overall9%
Leak-Proof7%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Material Quality6%
Quality-Overall5%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Dilute/Watery3%