Skip to content
58

lotion bulk

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.8%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 59Growth 23Conversion 46Competition 76Returns 96Price range 69Avg price 84Brand share 88Review moat 28Quality gap 23

Returns

Incredible0.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great47%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Avg price

Great$18.55

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great39%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Good$5.35–$36.42

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$493K

$493K/yr · 730K searches

Conversion

Okay3.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Okay3,679.57

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-4.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (39% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

25 falling

Sellers

64

Top-5 brand share

47%

Open market

47%

  • Jergens15%
  • Curel10%
  • KIYTARBOO9%
  • CRISTALBOX7%
  • Layhomo7%
  • BODY & EARTH # LOVE6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$20K8%$39K12%$59K16%$79K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 42 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -4.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
60K40KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell24%

“fragrance free”

Gifting Purpose15%

“Great for gifting”

Value For Money10%

“Great Value”

Moist/Dry9%

“Great moisturizer”

Quality-Overall8%

“Very good quality lotion”

Size-Overall7%

“fits great in bag or backpack”

Soft Feel5%

“Smooth and soft”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“As advertised”

Suitability Combination Skin2%

“Excellent for your skin”

Absorbency1%

“Absorbed nicely”

What buyers complain about

Smell20%

“Smell is unpleasant”

Moist/Dry14%

“does not moisturize”

Size-Overall7%

“Small tubes”

Quality-Overall6%

“Junk product”

Dilute/Watery3%

“Extremely watery”

Motor Power3%

“pumps won't open”

Value For Money2%

“Waste of money”

Thickness2%

“Super thin - not what I would consider a cream at all”

Oily/Greasy2%

“Very greasy”

Allergies2%

“I am allergic”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall29%
Smell21%
Advertised Vs Actual Product12%
Value For Money7%
Moist/Dry5%
Quality-Overall4%
Leak-Proof4%
Texture/Consistency-Overall2%
Functionality-Overall2%
Defective Material/Parts2%