Skip to content
40

korean hand lotion

Skip it

Soft demand (-43.7% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 30Growth 3Conversion 89Competition 22Returns 97Price range 71Avg price 77Brand share 22Review moat 27Quality gap 18

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great$15.81

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$4.35–$40.52

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Okay$134K

$134K/yr · 82K searches

Review moat

Okay3,754

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad73%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad91%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-43.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 73% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

9 rising

Sellers

18

Top-5 brand share

91%

Open market

6%

  • Curel69%
  • Yu-Be9%
  • esfolio6%
  • HARUHARU5%
  • WELCOS3%
  • TONYMOLY2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 6%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$13K20%$27K30%$40K40%$54K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 17 weeks — -43.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K750Mar '26Mar '26Apr '26Apr '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26Jul '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Moist/Dry27%

“Very hydrating”

Soft Feel10%

“Smooth”

Smell9%

“Nice smell”

Quality-Overall8%

“I am very impressed with the quality of this long lasting”

Value For Money6%

“Good price”

Suitability Dry Skin6%

“Great for dry skin”

Absorbency4%

“Absorbs well”

Suitability Winter Weather2%

“strong enough coverage for the harsh weather in winter”

Weight Light2%

“I like that its lightweight”

Suitability Combination Skin2%

“Good for sensitive skin”

What buyers complain about

Smell11%

“The smell was disgusting”

Value For Money9%

“waste of money”

Moist/Dry9%

“Usually I get horribly dry”

Thickness6%

“it was thicker”

Size-Overall4%

“it was in a very small tube”

Oily/Greasy4%

“The cream is now greasy”

Adhesion/Stickiness4%

“It seems a bit sticky feeling to me”

Allergies4%

“I'm allergic”

Dilute/Watery2%

“it is a little watery”

Texture/Consistency-Overall2%

“gritty when I put it on”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Smell8%
Moist/Dry8%
Functionality-Overall7%
Leak-Proof6%
Texture/Consistency-Overall5%
Value For Money5%
Oily/Greasy5%
Adhesion/Stickiness4%