Skip to content
62

antifungal nail polish

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.6%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 39Growth 70Conversion 40Competition 65Returns 97Price range 73Avg price 83Brand share 51Review moat 23Quality gap 79

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$18.32

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$6.92–$36.73

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+52.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Good46%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good75%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Okay3.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Okay$198K

$198K/yr · 336K searches

Review moat

Bad7,192.07

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 46% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 rising

Sellers

104

Top-5 brand share

75%

Open market

17%

  • Dr.'s Remedy29%
  • Orly18%
  • PODERM12%
  • DERMATOOL8%
  • Silka8%
  • Kerasal8%
  • Open — no brand owns it (8 brands, 17%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$8K8%$16K12%$24K16%$32K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 29 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +52.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
23K18KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall18%

“Overall it seems like a well-made product”

Efficiency18%

“This product is very effective”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“As advertised”

Ease Of Application7%

“EASY TO APPLY”

Value For Money6%

“Good value”

Color5%

“I love the color”

Ease Of Use4%

“Easy to remove”

Symptom Reduction4%

“has improved”

Smell3%

“no strong odor”

Stitch/Finish/Polish2%

“I'm super impressed with the finish”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall30%

“Did not work”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“FALSE ADVERTISING”

Symptom Reduction5%

“Unfortunatly, no improvement”

Leak-Proof4%

“it leaked”

Value For Money4%

“Not worth the cost”

Color4%

“Not color expected”

Smell3%

“There is no strong scent either”

Color Fading/Discoloration2%

“I had several discolored”

Thickness2%

“do not grow out as thick”

Moist/Dry2%

“Terrible Dry Time”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall29%
Advertised Vs Actual Product24%
Leak-Proof11%
Color8%
Smell3%
Product Condition2%
Ingredients-Overall2%
Defective Material/Parts2%
Value For Money2%
Dilute/Watery1%