Skip to content
58

acrylic nail brush

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.6%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 80Growth 19Conversion 53Competition 55Returns 97Price range 75Avg price 62Brand share 54Review moat 40Quality gap 53

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Great$1.1M

$1.1M/yr · 1.9M searches

Price range

Great$4.76–$46.40

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Good$13.48

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Good52%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good72%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Good4.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay2,544.38

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-12.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 52% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 falling

Sellers

24

Top-5 brand share

72%

Open market

22%

  • SAVILAND26%
  • MelodySusie21%
  • PANA13%
  • AIRSEE7%
  • Shine Chance6%
  • modelones6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$46K8%$91K12%$137K16%$183K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 32 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -12.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
60K40KPrime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall25%

“Awesome quality”

Brush Quality17%

“Good quality brushes”

Value For Money9%

“Good deal”

Ease Of Use6%

“Easy to use”

Design-Overall6%

“Great designs”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“As advertised”

Size-Overall4%

“fit well in my hand”

Paint Quality3%

“Great for fine Gunpla painting details”

Ease Of Cleaning3%

“which helps keep them clean”

Durability3%

“they hold well”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall22%

“Cheaply made”

Durability11%

“easy to break”

Brush Quality6%

“HORRIBLE brush is not kolinsky”

Material Quality5%

“And acrylic gets stuck”

Ease Of Cleaning5%

“Hard to clean”

Size-Overall4%

“Bottles are a lot smaller than expected”

Adhesion/Stickiness4%

“It wouldnt even stick properly onces set”

Hard Feel3%

“The bristles were also kind of hard”

Ease Of Use3%

“Hard to use”

Value For Money3%

“A waste of money”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall21%
Quality-Overall15%
Functionality-Overall10%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Brush Quality8%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Value For Money4%
Product Condition3%
Material Quality3%
Ease Of Use2%