Skip to content
52

acetone wipes

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.4%), but a small market ($75K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 19Growth 41Conversion 90Competition 46Returns 98Price range 37Avg price 23Brand share 66Review moat 50Quality gap 50

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay1,523.64

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay57%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Okay+12.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Okay$4.06–$21.38

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Bad$8.31

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Bad$75K

$75K/yr · 84K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 57% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 falling

Sellers

42

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

30%

  • OAKDOLCHE25%
  • Glamonade18%
  • modelones10%
  • JODSONE7%
  • GELLEN5%
  • NINJA QUEST4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$8K20%$15K30%$23K40%$30K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 22 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 101 weeks — +12.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KPrime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use23%

“Very Convenient”

Ease Of Cleaning15%

“Cleans well”

Quality-Overall11%

“Overall, I'm pleased with the quality and effectiveness of these remover pads”

Efficiency8%

“It work well”

Smell8%

“It has a strong nice smell”

Value For Money7%

“Good deal”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Just as advertised”

Moist/Dry2%

“they are super moist”

Size-Overall2%

“Just the right size”

Durability1%

“Durable and versatile”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall13%

“Did not work well”

Moist/Dry12%

“Wipes were practically dry”

Value For Money7%

“Not worth the price”

Smell7%

“Scent is way too strong”

Size-Overall6%

“Quite small”

Thickness6%

“the pads are so thick”

Ease Of Cleaning5%

“not the best option literally is supposed to be a lint free wipe”

Quality-Overall4%

“especially since its not even a quality box”

Oily/Greasy2%

“they leave your hand squeaky and oily”

Ease Of Use2%

“Difficult to use”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall40%
Advertised Vs Actual Product12%
Smell9%
Size-Overall6%
Moist/Dry6%
Value For Money3%
Absorbency3%
Defective Material/Parts2%
Quality-Overall2%
Ease Of Cleaning2%