Skip to content
50

ultrasound picture frames

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 37% of clicks), but strong incumbent ratings (4.7★) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 43Growth 23Conversion 32Competition 78Returns 73Price range 53Avg price 67Brand share 74Review moat 45Quality gap 20

Competition

Great37%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Good61%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Returns

Good2.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Good$14.03

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$6.45–$24.71

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,012.35

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay$225K

$225K/yr · 627K searches

Conversion

Okay2.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-4.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (37% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

27 falling

Sellers

30

Top-5 brand share

61%

Open market

35%

  • Pearhead21%
  • KeaBabies16%
  • IHEIPYE14%
  • Zyeco5%
  • Mlatnod5%
  • Jwitao5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$7K6%$14K9%$20K12%$27K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 40 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -4.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KHoliday '24Spike '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall23%

“Good quality and delivered quickly”

Gifting Purpose18%

“Beautiful Gift”

Frame Quality9%

“Beautiful Frame”

Size-Overall8%

“And the size is perfect”

Value For Money6%

“Worth the money”

Design-Overall5%

“Very Cute Design”

Strength5%

“Solid build”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“exactly as advertised, got one for my mom and MIL and they both loved it for their soon to be here grandson”

Magnetic Strength/Adsorption4%

“Easy magnetic strips for assembly”

Ease Of Use4%

“Easy To Use”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall18%

“a 5x7 won't fit at all”

Quality-Overall14%

“Overpriced for the Quality”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“Does not appear like the image”

Scratch Resistance5%

“Came with a scratch”

Value For Money5%

“I think a bit expensive for what you're getting”

Gifting Purpose4%

“Personally, I would only value this at around a dollar and would not purchase it at regular gift frame prices”

Design-Overall4%

“the overall construction does not match what I would expect for a special baby or pregnancy frame that you want to keep for years”

Thickness4%

“Theyre very thin and small”

Durability3%

“Over time, the holder at the back breaks”

Strength3%

“feels very flimsy in person”

Top return reasons

Frame Quality24%
Size-Overall22%
Advertised Vs Actual Product10%
Quality-Overall7%
Value For Money6%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Magnetic Strength/Adsorption4%
Functionality-Overall3%
Material Quality2%
Color2%