Skip to content
50

tubby todd

Worth a look

Shows a $7.2M/yr market, but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 99Growth 17Conversion 61Competition 20Returns 94Price range 95Avg price 94Brand share 0Review moat 47Quality gap 21

Market size

Incredible$7.2M

$7.2M/yr · 2.8M searches

Price range

Incredible$21.26–$65.91

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Returns

Great1.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$48.52

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Okay1,849.64

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Bad76%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Growth

Bad-16.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 76% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

2 rising

Sellers

4

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • TUBBY TODD93%
  • JAN & JUL7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$715K20%$1.4M30%$2.1M40%$2.9M1001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 11 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -16.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
100K60KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money14%

“Worth the price point”

Allergies13%

“It does not irritate skin”

Quality-Overall11%

“Excellent product”

Moist/Dry9%

“Great for dryness”

Efficiency7%

“It worked fast”

Smell6%

“Fragrance free”

Soft Feel4%

“smooth the skin”

Skin Health3%

“Luckily it does well for my skin so”

Sensitivity-Overall3%

“Very gentle and easy un sensitive skin”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy to use”

What buyers complain about

Allergies35%

“Caused Immediate and Severe Rash”

Value For Money15%

“Way too expensive”

Functionality-Overall4%

“it's not effective at all”

Skin Health3%

“Burns babies skin”

Moist/Dry3%

“My babies had dry skin briefly”

Smell2%

“doesnt have a strong scent”

Thickness2%

“Very thick”

Size-Overall2%

“The containers are small”

Sensitivity-Overall2%

“Not Safe for Sensitive Skin”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“I think this is very misleading”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall18%
Size-Overall18%
Value For Money15%
Smell9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Leak-Proof5%
Product Condition4%
Skin Health3%
Defective Material/Parts2%
Moist/Dry1%