Skip to content
42

temple touch thermometer

Skip it

Soft demand (-39.7% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 23Growth 5Conversion 76Competition 19Returns 93Price range 87Avg price 95Brand share 14Review moat 9Quality gap 67

Avg price

Incredible$30.04

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great$10.40–$58.25

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Great7.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad$94K

$94K/yr · 43K searches

Competition

Bad77%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad94%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Review moat

Bad33,001.8

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-39.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 77% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

8 falling

Sellers

33

Top-5 brand share

94%

Open market

4%

  • Braun70%
  • GoodBaby17%
  • THERMOBIO3%
  • CaseSack2%
  • ADC2%
  • Frida2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 4%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$9K20%$19K30%$28K40%$37K1001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 27 weeks — -39.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K750Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use29%

“Easy and just as advertised”

Temperature Control18%

“Its pretty accurate with the temperature monitoring”

Quality-Overall10%

“Excellent quality”

Value For Money7%

“Price is affordable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“As described”

Accuracy-Overall5%

“Accurate and easy to use”

Efficiency2%

“Works perfectly”

Durability2%

“It is durable”

Battery Life2%

“Battery life”

Weight Light1%

“Lightweight easy to use”

What buyers complain about

Measurement/Reading Accuracy34%

“Highly inaccurate”

Temperature Control14%

“It did not accurately take a temperature”

Functionality-Overall9%

“Stopped working”

Accuracy-Overall7%

“NOT ACCURATE”

Quality-Overall5%

“Horrible quality”

Durability5%

“Broke after a couple uses”

Battery Life4%

“Battery isnt great”

Value For Money3%

“Waste of money”

Fever Relief2%

“is dealing with a fever”

Advertised Vs Actual Product1%

“is a disgusting way to advertise a product for babies and children”

Top return reasons

Measurement/Reading Accuracy40%
Functionality-Overall16%
Temperature Control7%
Value For Money5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Product Condition4%
Accuracy-Overall4%
Heating3%
Display-Overall2%
Defective Material/Parts2%