Skip to content
50

pregnancy journal

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($22.32 avg), but strong incumbent ratings (4.8★) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 64Growth 22Conversion 44Competition 49Returns 62Price range 86Avg price 93Brand share 57Review moat 58Quality gap 16

Avg price

Great$22.32

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$11.59–$40.38

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$593K

$593K/yr · 760K searches

Returns

Good2.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good1,163.43

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good71%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay56%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Okay3.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-5.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.8★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

The top 5 products take 56% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

21

Top-5 brand share

71%

Open market

24%

  • KeaBabies30%
  • Peachly15%
  • ZIRI & ZANE13%
  • ZICOTO8%
  • Lamare5%
  • Paper Plan5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$30K10%$59K15%$89K20%$119K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 23 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -5.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
23K18KSpike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall29%

“Beautiful quality”

Design-Overall15%

“elegant design”

Value For Money8%

“Worth buying”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“It was even better then expected”

Fun/Entertainment Experience6%

“It has so many opportunities to share memories”

Paper Quality5%

“The paper is a good quality”

Gifting Purpose4%

“gifted they love it”

Ease Of Use4%

“Easy to use”

Durability3%

“Durable”

Color3%

“Love the color and simplicity”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall19%

“Small”

Value For Money9%

“It looks much more expensive than it is”

Thickness8%

“The pages are thick”

Product Condition6%

“Reselling used”

Writing Experience6%

“Not much room to write on”

Adhesion/Stickiness6%

“is that you have to glue or tape on all the photos that you add. minus a half to full star”

Color5%

“we are gettin a tad tired of EVERYTHING being PINK”

Quality-Overall3%

“Im docking two stars because I was expecting the quality the old baby books were years ago”

Storage Capacity3%

“Not enough photo space”

Flatness1%

“lies flat when open”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall24%
Advertised Vs Actual Product24%
Value For Money11%
Gifting Purpose8%
Quality-Overall4%
Design-Overall3%
Functionality-Overall3%
Age Suitability2%
Color2%
Product Condition2%