Skip to content
53

name decals for walls

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.5%), but a small market ($24K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 6Growth 16Conversion 11Competition 81Returns 97Price range 81Avg price 95Brand share 76Review moat 58Quality gap 78

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$25.09

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great34%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Great$5.51–$58.05

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Great59%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Review moat

Good1,198.52

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-17.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad$24K

$24K/yr · 107K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (34% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

23 rising

Sellers

33

Top-5 brand share

59%

Open market

34%

  • Boao20%
  • Generic14%
  • VulgrCo10%
  • Decor Designs Decals8%
  • Woodland7%
  • WallTag7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$7096%$1K9%$2K12%$3K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 48 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -17.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall28%

“I found them very affordable for the quality of the product”

Advertised Vs Actual Product13%

“As advertised”

Color8%

“the colors are vibrant”

Size-Overall7%

“Perfect size”

Value For Money7%

“Worth it”

Ease Of Use7%

“Easy to use”

Design-Overall4%

“The design is fun”

Adhesion/Stickiness4%

“Stick good”

Brightness/Shine/Glow3%

“it is super bright”

Gifting Purpose2%

“Great Gift”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall21%

“Extremely Small”

Adhesion/Stickiness17%

“DOES NOT STICK”

Quality-Overall10%

“Quality is a bit flimsy”

Value For Money9%

“Not worth it”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“False advertisement”

Durability5%

“snapped in half”

Color4%

“Our exact color wasnt available”

Thickness3%

“They werent thick”

Ease Of Use2%

“hard to use”

Assembly/Installation2%

“could be an issue when installing”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall33%
Adhesion/Stickiness15%
Color14%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Value For Money7%
Quality-Overall6%
Display Colors2%
Functionality-Overall2%
Material Quality2%
Defective Material/Parts2%