Skip to content
54

liquid soap base

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.6%), but a deep review moat (10,141 avg reviews) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 26Growth 62Conversion 67Competition 54Returns 97Price range 87Avg price 95Brand share 41Review moat 22Quality gap 24

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$41.28

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$9.37–$65.13

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good6.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Good+39.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Good52%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay81%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay$105K

$105K/yr · 43K searches

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad10,140.83

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 52% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 flat

Sellers

33

Top-5 brand share

81%

Open market

12%

  • Dr. Bronner's25%
  • WHOLENATURALS19%
  • FLOWHYET19%
  • WEBE10%
  • Yoken8%
  • Brittanie's Thyme7%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 12%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$5K10%$11K15%$16K20%$21K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 29 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 98 weeks — +39.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26DecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall18%

“Amazing quality”

Smell14%

“Fragrance free”

Cleansing10%

“Cleans skin good”

Ease Of Cleaning8%

“Great for cleaning”

Value For Money8%

“Great value”

Soft Feel3%

“Leaves skin soft”

Lather3%

“Great lasting lather”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Just as advertised”

Ingredients-Overall3%

“Clean Ingredients”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy to use”

What buyers complain about

Smell15%

“Smells rancid”

Dilute/Watery12%

“LIKE WATER”

Thickness7%

“liquid is thick”

Ease Of Cleaning5%

“Barely keep me clean”

Value For Money5%

“Price is a little high”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“FALSE ADVERTISING”

Lather3%

“Unfortunately, this not only doesn't lather at all, it also does not clean your hands”

Leak-Proof3%

“Arrived Leaking”

Quality-Overall3%

“Poor quality control”

Moist/Dry3%

“Dr. Bronners has made me feel dry after using it on my skin in the past”

Top return reasons

Leak-Proof21%
Size-Overall17%
Smell16%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Value For Money5%
Dilute/Watery4%
Ingredients-Overall3%
Functionality-Overall2%
Defective Material/Parts2%
Moist/Dry2%