Skip to content
44

johnsons baby powder original

Skip it

A small market ($37K/yr) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 9Growth 24Conversion 70Competition 29Returns 99Price range 51Avg price 69Brand share 27Review moat 23Quality gap 80

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Good6.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Good$14.23

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$2.03–$28.28

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Okay68%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay89%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-2.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad7,000.81

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad$37K

$37K/yr · 41K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 68% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 rising

Sellers

663

Top-5 brand share

89%

Open market

11%

  • Johnson's Baby52%
  • Johnson & Johnson19%
  • Chicco8%
  • mGanna3%
  • FOUNTINA3%
  • 365 by Whole Foods Market3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 11%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$4K20%$7K30%$11K40%$15K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 16 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 97 weeks — -2.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell26%

“Clean scent”

Quality-Overall17%

“It's well made”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“As advertised”

Value For Money6%

“affordable”

Size-Overall6%

“Perfect fit”

Soft Feel5%

“Feels smooth on my skin”

Moist/Dry5%

“absorbs moisture well”

Efficiency2%

“Works well to help remove sand from feet and legs”

Ingredients-Overall2%

“Great alternative to original Johnson's baby powder”

Allergies1%

“No skin irritation”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall35%

“Smaller than expected”

Smell14%

“weird smell”

Value For Money10%

“Too expensive”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“The entire item is misleading”

Texture/Consistency-Overall3%

“It has the texture of gritty fine sand”

Allergies3%

“Allergic reactions”

Ease Of Use2%

“It took me several minutes to remove it”

Leak-Proof2%

“Leaked a little”

Moist/Dry2%

“Instead of keeping my skin dry & smooth, this powder felt chalky at first and then became sticky and gummy with any moisture”

Hard Feel2%

“It was gritty feeling”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall32%
Smell29%
Advertised Vs Actual Product14%
Value For Money5%
Functionality-Overall4%
Leak-Proof3%
Texture/Consistency-Overall3%
Ingredients-Overall2%
Product Condition1%
Defective Material/Parts1%