Skip to content
49

fake butterflies

Skip it

A small market ($69K/yr) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 17Growth 36Conversion 39Competition 70Returns 74Price range 56Avg price 39Brand share 84Review moat 48Quality gap 40

Brand share

Great51%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Returns

Good2.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Good43%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Good$5.02–$27.57

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay1,727.11

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Okay3.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Okay$10.65

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Okay+8.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$69K

$69K/yr · 208K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 43% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

38 falling

Sellers

49

Top-5 brand share

51%

Open market

46%

  • SAOROPEB22%
  • Opseam16%
  • LET'S RESIN5%
  • FreshCut Crafts5%
  • XUNXMAS4%
  • QUPIVA3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$3K8%$5K12%$8K16%$11K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 44 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +8.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Color19%

“Great variety of colors”

Quality-Overall15%

“They were higher quality than I expected”

Value For Money9%

“Great Value”

Ease Of Use6%

“Easy to use”

Design-Overall6%

“Fun design”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“as advertised”

Adhesion/Stickiness5%

“Sticks really well”

Magnetic Strength/Adsorption4%

“Theyre easy to attach with the magnets”

Size-Overall3%

“Size is perfect”

Durability3%

“held up well”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall20%

“Very big”

Adhesion/Stickiness14%

“Didnt stick”

Quality-Overall7%

“Cheaply made”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“Not as Shown”

Color7%

“Was very disappointed because the colors are muted”

Durability4%

“just couldnt get them not to break”

Strength3%

“Fragile”

Value For Money3%

“Overall very disappointed with product for the price that was paid”

Magnetic Strength/Adsorption2%

“Poor Magnet Strength”

Thickness2%

“of course the butterflies are thin”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall42%
Color10%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Adhesion/Stickiness7%
Value For Money6%
Quality-Overall5%
Material Quality5%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Display Colors2%
Magnetic Strength/Adsorption2%