Skip to content
51

earthquake straps

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.7%), but a small market ($81K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 20Growth 24Conversion 62Competition 71Returns 81Price range 51Avg price 47Brand share 79Review moat 47Quality gap 38

Returns

Great1.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great56%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Good42%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Good5.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good$5.05–$25.33

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay1,791.79

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Okay$11.69

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-1.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$81K

$81K/yr · 128K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 42% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

31 rising

Sellers

65

Top-5 brand share

56%

Open market

38%

  • Booda Brand17%
  • Quakehold!17%
  • Ougourim9%
  • Safety 1st7%
  • Oudain6%
  • LOMILY6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$2K6%$5K9%$7K12%$10K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 43 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 19 weeks — -1.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '26Mar '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Strength12%

“Heavy duty”

Ease Of Use10%

“Easy to use”

Security10%

“safe to use”

Quality-Overall9%

“The quality feels solid”

Adhesion/Stickiness8%

“Strong adhesive”

Locking Mechanism7%

“The locking mechanism feels durable and well-designed”

Assembly/Installation6%

“Easy to set up”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“As advertised”

Value For Money6%

“Worth it”

Durability4%

“Strong and durable”

What buyers complain about

Adhesion/Stickiness19%

“Poor Adhesive”

Durability7%

“break easily”

Strength6%

“Not strong eniugh”

Functionality-Overall6%

“Does not do the job”

Locking Mechanism6%

“Just awful, I have had to replace the adhesive pads a few times already and thats not good when you have little ones trying to get into everything and it wont hold the latch”

Quality-Overall4%

“Poor quality control”

Ease Of Use4%

“Too Simple”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting3%

“Does NOT come with instructions”

Strap/String Quality3%

“The straps are thin”

Size-Overall3%

“They are tiny”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall22%
Adhesion/Stickiness11%
Functionality-Overall10%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Compatibility-Overall7%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Locking Mechanism5%
Strap/String Quality4%
Assembly/Installation4%
Strength3%