Skip to content
51

black basket

Worth a look

Shows no brand lock-in (top 5 brands take 40% of clicks), but soft demand (-30.7% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 54Growth 10Conversion 29Competition 86Returns 49Price range 74Avg price 84Brand share 95Review moat 24Quality gap 22

Brand share

Incredible40%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great29%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$18.69

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$5.70–$41.18

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$376K

$376K/yr · 864K searches

Returns

Okay3.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Okay2.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Bad5,299.36

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-30.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (29% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

42 falling

Sellers

48

Top-5 brand share

40%

Open market

55%

  • UBBCARE10%
  • Goodpick10%
  • WILLITAT7%
  • MEGASKET7%
  • xianshengle6%
  • CubesLand5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$11K6%$23K9%$34K12%$45K101001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 58 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -30.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall17%

“Premium quality”

Size-Overall16%

“Fits well in tight spaces”

Strength11%

“This basket is sturdy”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“As described”

Storage Capacity8%

“Great for storage”

Value For Money6%

“very affordable”

Durability4%

“Sturdy and durable”

Color3%

“Color is pretty”

Gifting Purpose3%

“Perfect for gifts”

Ease Of Use3%

“Easy to use”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall26%

“Small”

Strength10%

“Flimsy”

Durability5%

“Fall apart”

Quality-Overall5%

“Cheap”

Shape/Style4%

“lose their shape”

Color3%

“I did not order grey”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“The item description saying they're made of thick sturdy cardboard is just a straight up lie”

Smell2%

“They had a faint odor that went away afrer a day or two”

Material Quality2%

“The material is cheap”

Thickness2%

“The material was thick”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall66%
Bin Capacity9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Value For Money3%
Color3%
Strength3%
Quality-Overall2%
Shape/Style2%
Defective Material/Parts2%
Material Quality2%