Skip to content
54

baby thermometer

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.8%), but soft demand (-12.2% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 95Growth 19Conversion 77Competition 23Returns 96Price range 79Avg price 88Brand share 32Review moat 19Quality gap 37

Returns

Incredible0.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Incredible$2.4M

$2.4M/yr · 1.6M searches

Avg price

Great$20.15

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$4.43–$57.08

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Great7.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay86%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Bad72%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Growth

Bad-12.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad15,306.28

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products capture 72% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

12 rising

Sellers

44

Top-5 brand share

86%

Open market

11%

  • Frida45%
  • GoodBaby20%
  • Safety 1st8%
  • Viproud8%
  • Boncare5%
  • ANMEATE3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (6 brands, 11%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$243K20%$487K30%$730K40%$974K1001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 18 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -12.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
40K30KSpike '24Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use27%

“easy to handle”

Temperature Control15%

“Good temperature reading easy to use very speedy reading good value”

Value For Money10%

“Price is affordable”

Quality-Overall10%

“Great quality for the price point”

Accuracy-Overall7%

“Accurate and easy to use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Exactly as advertised”

Efficiency4%

“Effective”

Durability2%

“Seems easy to clean and durable”

Battery Life2%

“long battery life”

Design-Overall2%

“The design is simple”

What buyers complain about

Measurement/Reading Accuracy26%

“Bad readings”

Temperature Control12%

“doesnt allow to register actual temperature”

Functionality-Overall10%

“It doesn't function”

Accuracy-Overall8%

“NOT ACCURATE”

Quality-Overall6%

“Awful quality control”

Battery Life6%

“Poor battery life”

Durability6%

“Broke right away”

Value For Money3%

“Waste of money”

Ease Of Use2%

“Isnt user friendly”

Fever Relief1%

“is dealing with a fever”

Top return reasons

Measurement/Reading Accuracy36%
Functionality-Overall18%
Temperature Control7%
Value For Money7%
Accuracy-Overall5%
Heating4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Product Condition3%
Display-Overall3%
Defective Material/Parts2%