Skip to content
53

akord slim 2 pack refill liners

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (18.6% search→purchase), but a small market ($25K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 6Growth 68Conversion 99Competition 13Returns 96Price range 95Avg price 95Brand share 28Review moat 76Quality gap 40

Conversion

Incredible18.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$24.48

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Incredible$16.28–$36.57

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Great479.44

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Good+48.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay88%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Bad84%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Market size

Bad$25K

$25K/yr · 6K searches

Competition

The top 5 products capture 84% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

8 flat

Sellers

10

Top-5 brand share

88%

Open market

7%

  • AKORD49%
  • Zippland18%
  • Godyoy11%
  • RUNDE6%
  • COMFICOVE5%
  • GEN DIAPER PAILS5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%$4K30%$8K45%$11K60%$15K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 9 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +48.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
225175Spike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell25%

“Great substitute, blocks odor - really no waste odors, well contained so other than trap-door lid no cleaning/disinfecting is required”

Quality-Overall17%

“Good quality refills”

Adhesion/Stickiness8%

“Liners”

Storage Capacity8%

“Excellent storage for your wet items”

Functionality-Overall8%

“THESE ITEMS WORK VERY WELL”

Strength4%

“Sturdy and well made”

Ease Of Use4%

“Easy to use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Does the job”

Size-Overall4%

“Fits perfectly”

Cutting/Trimming3%

“These bags go through easily and cut nicely”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall30%

“not fit”

Thickness17%

“They are a little thicker”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“Much less than the name brand”

Quality-Overall10%

“Good quality, did not fit due to insufficient width”

Ease Of Use7%

“harder to work with”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall69%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Value For Money5%
Compatibility-Overall5%
Metal Quality3%
Thin3%
Smell3%
Product Condition2%
Dispensing Mechanism2%
Measurement/Reading Accuracy1%