Skip to content
52

wix cabin air filter

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.3%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 13Growth 83Conversion 47Competition 80Returns 90Price range 62Avg price 76Brand share 0Review moat 61Quality gap 24

Returns

Great1.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Great+80.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Great35%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$15.36

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$7.36–$27.31

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good1,044.83

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Okay3.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad$53K

$53K/yr · 92K searches

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (35% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

5 rising

Sellers

128

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Purolator79%
  • Wix18%
  • Bosch1%
  • EPAuto1%
  • HZYAMZ1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$2K6%$3K9%$5K12%$6K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 52 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 101 weeks — +80.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
7K5KPrime Day '25Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Aug, Sep, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall35%

“Excellent fit”

Quality-Overall14%

“Quality seems as good as OEM”

Filtration14%

“Excellent air filter for the price”

Value For Money10%

“Excellent Value”

Assembly/Installation8%

“no issues installing it”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“As advertised”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy to change”

Efficiency1%

“so it seems that the activated carbon is working effectively”

Maintenance And Repair1%

“Significant savings in routine dealer maintenance cost”

Smell1%

“Good airflow smells fresh”

What buyers complain about

Compatibility-Overall24%

“Alarming why this would be indicated as compatible”

Size-Overall19%

“Didn't fit”

Filtration9%

“The gasket molding around the filter looks sloppy and cheap”

Thickness6%

“the rubber edge is way too thick”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Doesn't fit what Amazon described”

Quality-Overall4%

“Cheap”

Smell2%

“These made my car stink now”

Strength2%

“A little flimsy”

Flexibility1%

“Flexible unlike OE so little more finesse to install”

Product Condition1%

“Bought used”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall53%
Compatibility-Overall22%
Filtration13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Value For Money3%
Product Condition1%
Assembly/Installation1%
Quality-Overall1%
Defective Material/Parts1%
Functionality-Overall1%