Skip to content
54

vvt solenoid

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($36.20 avg), but soft demand (-8.3% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 62Growth 21Conversion 39Competition 81Returns 30Price range 72Avg price 95Brand share 52Review moat 85Quality gap 47

Avg price

Incredible$36.20

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great301.8

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Great34%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Good$16.75–$132.38

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$555K

$555K/yr · 487K searches

Brand share

Good74%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Okay3.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Okay5.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Bad-8.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (34% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

19 falling

Sellers

86

Top-5 brand share

74%

Open market

23%

  • A-Premium39%
  • Dorman17%
  • KacuYelin7%
  • NewYall6%
  • GM GENUINE PARTS5%
  • HY-SPEED3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$28K10%$56K15%$83K20%$111K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 50 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -8.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall24%

“Fit good”

Value For Money17%

“Great Value”

Quality-Overall15%

“Always good quality and reliable”

Assembly/Installation13%

“Three bolts and two connectors, so SIMPLE”

Advertised Vs Actual Product11%

“Works as expected”

Efficiency7%

“worked as expected”

Ease Of Use1%

“Very simple”

Leak-Proof1%

“its stopped the leak”

Maintenance And Repair1%

“Easy replacement and much cheaper than a mechanic and costs much less than autozone or orielly”

Durability1%

“I've had these on the car for over 10,000 miles seem to be durable and well built”

What buyers complain about

Durability13%

“One of them failed after a couple of weeks”

Functionality-Overall12%

“Car ran worse with these”

Quality-Overall8%

“Garbage”

Assembly/Installation7%

“One broke down before getting install very very fragile”

Leak-Proof6%

“Did not resolve oil leak”

Size-Overall6%

“The size matterd”

Sensor6%

“Frustrating because this is my second replacement sensor that didn't fit”

Product Condition5%

“dont look new it has a black plastic piece that eas broke off of something”

Compatibility-Overall4%

“NOT COMPATIBLE”

Defective Material/Parts3%

“Amazon engine parts are bad”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall21%
Functionality-Overall17%
Defective Material/Parts16%
Compatibility-Overall15%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Product Condition4%
Sensor3%
Value For Money3%
Assembly/Installation2%
Socket/Port/Plug2%